Tuesday, 28 May 2024

 

 

LATEST NEWS Aam Aadmi Party leader Hira Lal Kundra joins BJP along with his supporters Union Minister Hardeep Singh Puri Interacts with a transgender tea seller & dhaba owners Sanjay Tandon exposes opportunist and unholy Cong-AAP alliance Photo depicting internal feud of Congress becomes talk of town : Shakti Prakash Devshali Final countdown for non-resident MP, Bittu has begun : Amarinder Singh Raja Warring PPCC President Raja Warring Mobilizes Support for Frozepur Lok Sabha Candidate Sher Singh Ghubaya Arvind Kejriwal in Ludhiana - BJP is conspiring to stop your free electricity Send your son to the parliament, he will definitely become a minister in the central government: Bhagwant Mann Raghav Chadha campaigned for candidate Gurpreet GP in Fatehgarh Sahib Amit Shah threatened three crore Punjabis, Kejriwal & Mann hit back at the Home Minister Bhagwant Mann campaigned for Faridkot candidate Karamjit Anmol in Gidderbaha and Rampura Phul I made electricity free, electricity is the most expensive in BJP ruled states, still BJP people call me corrupt : Arvind Kejriwal Four Laning of Naina Devi Road and beautification around Gurdwara Sahib top priority: Vijay Inder Singla AAP’s 13-Zero will be converted into Zero-13 on June 4 : Gurjeet Singh Aujla Free Sikh religious institutions from the control of the RSS–Sukhbir Singh Badal appeals to the PM PM Narendra Modi will establish International Financial Center in Zirakpur: Preneet Kaur Former mayors and deputy mayors of BJP came together and challenged Congress candidate Manish Tewari Santosh Iyer Net Worth (May 2024) and His Success Story | 5 Dariya News Travis Head Net Worth 2024 | Know The Income Sources Of Travis Head BJP struggled for Ram Mandir for 30 years, Modi got Shri Ram Lala out of the tent: Uttarakhand CM Pushkar Dhami Raja Warring Denounces Party Traitors, Urges Voters to Choose Development

 

Policies for greater access to rural healthcare mustn't short-change rural residents : SC

Supreme Court, The Supreme Court Of India, New Delhi
Listen to this article

Web Admin

Web Admin

5 Dariya News

New Delhi , 24 Jan 2023

The Supreme Court on Tuesday said that a state legislature has no legislative competence to enact a law in respect of modern medicine or allopathic medicine, contrary to the standards that have been determined by the central law.

It emphasised that policies for enhancing access to rural healthcare must not "short-change" the citizens residing in rural areas or subject them to direct or indirect forms of unfair discrimination on the basis of their place of birth or residence.

A bench of Justices B.R. Gavai and B.V. Nagarathna said: "Any variation between the standards of qualification required for medical practitioners who render services in rural areas qua the medical practitioners rendering services in urban or metropolitan areas must prescribe to constitutional values of substantive equality and non-discrimination."

It said that deciding the particular qualifications for medical practitioners practising in disparate areas and in disparate fields, providing different levels of primary, secondary or tertiary medical services, is within the mandate of expert and statutory authorities entrusted with the mandate by the Parliament.

Justice Nagarathna, who authored the judgment on behalf of the bench, said while the state has every right to devise policies for public health and medical education, with due regard to peculiar social and financial considerations, these policies ought not to cause unfair disadvantage to any class of citizens.

"The citizens residing in rural areas have an equal right to access healthcare services, by duly qualified staff. Policies for enhancing access to rural healthcare must not short-change the citizens residing in rural areas or subject them to direct or indirect forms of unfair discrimination on the basis of their place of birth or residence," said the bench, in its 139-page judgment.

The top court's judgment came on an appeal against the Gauhati High Court order, struck down the Assam Rural Health Regulatory Authority Act, 2004, on the ground that it was ultra vires the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 as well as unconstitutional.

The top court said: "We hold that decision of the Gauhati High Court holding that the Assam Act to be null and void, is just and proper". It added that in view of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 and the Rules and Regulations made thereunder, the Assam Act is declared to be null and void.

The Assam government had introduced a three-year diploma course to address the issue of the shortage of qualified medical professionals by producing a cadre of doctors allowed to practice modern medicine, to a very limited extent.

The Indian Medical Association (IMA), the main respondent in the case, had argued that the Assam Act discriminates between patients living in rural areas and those living in urban areas, implying that the persons who live in urban areas are entitled to standard treatment and those who live in rural areas are entitled to sub-standard treatment.

"There are more than 2,244 MBBS doctors working in the rural areas of Assam; even if there is a shortfall of doctors in the rural areas and the Assam Act aims to remedy the shortfall, the solution lies in increasing their coverage via permissible means and not otherwise," it had submitted.

The Assam government did not challenge the judgment passed by the high court, which struck down the Assam Act and only private individuals were appellants before the apex court. Assam enacted a subsequent legislation and has tried to accommodate the ousted diploma holders in different capacities. 

Dismissing the appeals, the top court said: "The subsequent legislation, namely, the Assam Act of 2015 i.e., the Assam Community Professionals (Registration and Competency) Act, 2015, enacted pursuant to the judgment of the Gauhati High Court, is a valid piece of Legislation as it has removed the basis of the impugned judgment passed by the Gauhati High Court. 

The 2015 Act is also not in conflict with the IMC Act, 1956, hence, by a separate legislation the Community Health Professionals have been permitted to practise as such professionals. The said legislation of 2015 is not in conflict with IMC, Act, 1956 and the rules and regulations made thereunder."

 

Tags: Supreme Court , The Supreme Court Of India , New Delhi

 

 

related news

 

 

 

Photo Gallery

 

 

Video Gallery

 

 

5 Dariya News RNI Code: PUNMUL/2011/49000
© 2011-2024 | 5 Dariya News | All Rights Reserved
Powered by: CDS PVT LTD