Thursday, 29 September 2022

 

 

LATEST NEWS After 'Major', Revathi to star in 'Aye Zindagi' as medical grief counsellor Surat will soon be known as 'Electric Vehicle city': Narendra Modi Calling Babar Azam a one-dimensional player is a little harsh : Rohan Gavaskar Shubman Gill is more than capable of holding his own in white-ball cricket : Rohan Gavaskar Google will notify you if your personal info appears in Search Won't 'mankad' a player unless I am really angry with someone : Moeen Ali IND v SA : Arshdeep Singh's new-ball burst augurs well for India on road to T20 World Cup Elon Musk extremely worried at child porn proliferation on Twitter World Animal Welfare Day 2022: Know More About It Supreme Court Historic Decision On Abortion & Marital Rape Attitude Song: Another Footapping Song From BBPN Featuring Diljit Dosanjh & Navi Brar Is Out Honeymoon: First Song Jhaanjar From Gippy Grewal & Jasmin Bhasin’s Upcoming Film To Be Out Soon BJP National Spokesperson K K Sharma attended Media coordination team meeting Eloelo named Online startup of the year at the Entrepreneur Awards 2022 Drishyam 2 Teaser: Recall Of Drishyam, Ajay Devgn Seems Confessing Crime Kanpur Coaching Centre Catches Fire: 20 Students Trapped Inside Together Forever: Honey Singh, Rupan Bal & Dilpreet VFX Share Poster Of Upcoming Song Karanvir Bohra plays spine-chilling serial killer in 'Aashiqana' Chiranjeevi's 'GodFather' portrays succession battle after a CM's death Elizabeth Olsen wants Scarlet Witch to team up with the X-Men now India logs 4,272 fresh Covid infections, 27 deaths

 

1988 road rage case: Supreme Court sentences Navjot Singh Sidhu to one-year jail

Navjot Singh Sidhu, Congress, Chandigarh, Punjab Congress, Former Punjab Congress Chief, Supreme Court

Web Admin

Web Admin

5 Dariya News

New Delhi , 19 May 2022

In a setback to former Punjab Congress chief Navjot Singh Sidhu, the Supreme Court on Thursday sentenced him to one-year in jail in a 1988 road rage case. A bench headed by Justice A.M. Khanwilkar allowed the review petition by the family of victim Gurnam Singh against the top court's 2018 verdict, which let off Sidhu with a mere Rs 1,000 fine. The top court enhanced the sentence to Sidhu to one year. The top court said, "We have allowed a review application on the issue of sentence...we impose a sentence of imprisonment of one year to be undergone by the respondent..." The order in the matter will be uploaded later in the day. On March 25, the Supreme Court reserved the verdict on a review petition seeking a direction to enhance the sentence awarded to Sidhu in the 1988 road rage case. Senior advocate A.M. Singhvi, representing Sidhu, submitted before a bench headed by Justice A.M. Khanwilkar that sentence was a discretion of court and no interference could be done except in cases of death penalty, given in rarest of the rare and in the present case, and added there was no need to have a relook at the 2018 judgment. 

"Appeal on adequacy of sentence should not be entertained. The state is not in appeal against the sentence and the victim cannot challenge the adequacy," submitted Singhvi. He further added that there has been no allegation of lack of cooperation on the part of his client. The bench, also comprising Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, noted that the issue before it was only whether despite the court having issued limited notice on (point of) sentence the provision under which sentence has been imposed needs to be looked at. The bench reserved the judgment after hearing detailed arguments in the matter. The plea was filed by the kin of the deceased, Gurnam Singh seeking a relook on the 2018 judgment. Senior advocate Sidharth Luthra, representing the victim's family, submitted that the death due to cardiac arrest is not correct, and a blow was delivered on the victim. Singhvi vehemently argued that it was extremely doubtful that an injury, caused by a fist blow, could have led to the death. Luthra argued that the 2018 judgment failed to consider the previous decision in the case of Richhpal Singh Meena vs Ghasi (2014). He added that, in this case, the top court was of the view that when there is death of a human being, it may either be culpable homicide (amounting or not amounting to murder) or not culpable homicide.

 

Tags: Navjot Singh Sidhu , Congress , Chandigarh , Punjab Congress , Former Punjab Congress Chief , Supreme Court

 

 

related news

 

 

 

Photo Gallery

 

 

Video Gallery

 

 

5 Dariya News RNI Code: PUNMUL/2011/49000
© 2011-2022 | 5 Dariya News | All Rights Reserved
Powered by: CDS PVT LTD