Friday, 26 April 2024

 

 

LATEST NEWS Vigilance Bureau Arrests Patwari Accepting Rs 10,000 Bribe For Mutation Of Land Vigilance Bureau Nabs Senior Assistant For Taking Rs 20,000 Bribe Vigilance Bureau Nabs Reader Of Sho Nri Police Station Taking Rs 20,000 Bribe SANY Heavy Industry India Pvt Ltd Expands Presence with Grand Opening of Raghunath Machinery HO in Rayagada, Odisha Ideathon 2K24 held at CGC Jhanjeri, 160 teams from various colleges participated Retailers Discuss Ways to Stay Ahead of the Curve at the RAI Hyderabad Retail Summit 2024 Bobby Deol Drives the Badass Seltos Hyundai Motor Group Executive Chair Euisun Chung Visits India to Underline Mid-to long-term Mobility Strategic Commitments Rupnagar police arrest accomplice of attackers involved in murder of VHP leader Vikas Prabhakar Complete exercise of identifying critical polling stations within this week : Sakshi Sawhney The impact of the Deputy Commissioner Dr. Senu Duggal strictness, a record jump in lifting in two days Deputy Commissioner Visits Kharar Mandi, Reviews Wheat Procurement and Lifting Lifting of purchased wheat within 72 hours crossed the figure of 177 percent Late Kannada Film Producer Soundarya Jagadeesh Net Worth | 5 Dariya News 10 Best Crime Web Series To Watch In April 2024 | 5 Dariya News Pledge taking ceremony under SVEEP held at DHS Jammu General Observer reviews Election preparedness in Poonch Mega SVEEP Campaign witnesses over 8,000 Events, mobilize 560,000 Participants in Single Day DIPR conducts a vibrant SVEEP Campaign to spread awareness among Voters 2nd Randomisation of polling staff held at Kulgam General, Police Observers for Anantnag-Rajouri PC visit Kulgam

 

Supreme Court dismisses TN plea seeking recall of 2014 verdict banning Jallikattu

Listen to this article

Web Admin

Web Admin

5 Dariya News

New Delhi , 16 Nov 2016

In a blow to Tamil Nadu government's efforts to get top court's nod for 'Jallikattu', the Supreme Court on Wednesday dismissed the state's plea seeking recall of its 2014 verdict banning the bull-fights, holding that the practice amounted to cruelty to the animals.Dismissing the Tamil Nadu government's plea seeking the restoration of Jallikattu during Pongal festival, the bench of Justice Dipak Misra and Justice Rohinton Fali Nariman brushed aside the state government's argument that the 3,500-year-old tradition was rooted in religion.Rejecting the argument, the bench, in its orders dismissing the review petition, said that there was no connection or connectivity of Jallikattu with religion."Such a concept is alien to the concept of freedom of religion" guaranteed under Article 25 of the constitution, the bench said in its order.As senior counsel Shekhar Naphade appearing for Tamil Nadu told the court that Jallikattu was a "socio-cultural religious event associated with the harvesting of the crop", the bench said: "It is not a religious practice. It has nothing to do with religion... (By saying that it was religious) we are defaming the framers of the constitution."

Holding that the Tamil Nadu Regulation of Jallikattu Act, 2009 was repugnant to the Prevention of Cruelty to Animal Act, 1960, the top court by its May 7, 2014 verdict had banned the bull-fighting, saying bulls could not be used as performing animals, either for the Jallikattu events or bullock-cart races.The court by its 2014 verdict had also urged the Union government to accord constitutional status to animal rights.The court also rejected the Tamil Nadu's position that the state law on Jallikattu was not repugnant to the Prevention of Cruelty to Animal Act, as the law covered a "very very narrow space" not occupied by the central law.Having dismissed the Tamil Nadu government's plea seeking the recall of the May 7, 2014, judgment, the bench said that the hearing on the batch of petitions challenging the January 7, 2016, notification would take place on December 1.Taking away the very basis of 2014 judgment, January 7 notification permitted the use of bulls for Jallikattu and cart races.In the last hearing of the matter on November 9, the court had said that though animals may not have rights but they can't be subjected to cruelty by the people and observed that what is embedded in the Constitution and the statute could not be taken away by a notification.

 

Tags: Supreme Court

 

 

related news

 

 

 

Photo Gallery

 

 

Video Gallery

 

 

5 Dariya News RNI Code: PUNMUL/2011/49000
© 2011-2024 | 5 Dariya News | All Rights Reserved
Powered by: CDS PVT LTD